Product Description
HP's business pacesetter tackles high-volume printing with legendary reliability. Count on this HP LaserJet to help conserve resources, customize printing policies, and improve security
Product Details
- Brand: HP
- Model: M601n
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 21.00" h x 19.50" w x 23.00" l, 57.00 pounds
Features
- Print at rapid speeds on a variety of paper types
- Manage workflow with intuitive features right on the printer, and get quick prints from a flash drive
- Produce high print volumes with low maintenance

Customer Reviews
Most helpful customer reviews
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful.
Great Printer
By Jamie
This is the 6th HP 600 that I have purchased for our business. The oldest one is a year old and we haven't had any problems or complaints. Such a nice change from the HP 3005/3015 that we have trouble with all the time. Received it promptly and as promised.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
Replacement Printer
By IT in Ypsi
This replaced an old HP 8150 (worked over 6 years). Had for a month. Setup was simple (on network). Prints very fast. Large input and output tray. So far no problems.
0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
Good Printer, questionable seller
By Bob
I purchased this printer as "New" from pcrush-outlet. It also came with the toner installed which raised red flags with me since I've never received a new printer that way.
We have been having problems with creased paper output.
A search of the serial number on HP's website for warranty repair shows this printer as REFURBISHED, not new.
We have another of these printers and it's been great. I think that I was just given someone else's problem by a disreputable seller.
Update: The fuser was replaced under warranty and that seemed to fix the problem. Changing the rating of the printer to 4 stars since we have two of these and other than this issue on this printer, it has worked very well.
As I noted, I think the problem with this printer could be attributed to the fact that it wasn't actually "New".
No comments:
Post a Comment